Register an institution record
Registers the institution’s record for a consultation that completed with an active restriction. Send kind: exceptional_proceed with a justification and a circumstance when the institution proceeds despite the restriction. Send kind: refusal_explanation with the explanation that the institution gave when it refused.
A consultation holds one record, and a second request returns 409 with code SRC-0101. A consultation that did not complete with an active restriction returns 409 with code SRC-0102.
Autorizaciones
The access token received from the authorization server in the OAuth 2.0 flow.
Encabezados
Optional correlation id (UUID) propagated through logs/traces and into the evidence trail.
Parámetros de ruta
Consultation identifier (UUID). A malformed identifier returns 422 SRC-0002 with a field violation on id.
"8f14e45f-ceea-467a-9a36-dedd4bea2543"
Cuerpo
Which paragraph of art. 2º-A this record answers: "exceptional_proceed" (§1º — contracted despite the active restriction) or "refusal_explanation" (§2º — refused, and this is what the interested party was told). REQUIRED. It decides which prose members are mandatory and which are refused.
exceptional_proceed, refusal_explanation "exceptional_proceed"
Who filed the record, as an institution-side identity. REQUIRED for both kinds, 1..255 characters.
1 - 255"maria.compliance@bank.example"
The exceptional circumstance alleged (for instance, a holder prevented from removing the protection request). REQUIRED when kind is "exceptional_proceed", 1..1000 characters; REFUSED when kind is "refusal_explanation".
1 - 1000Content of the explanation given to the interested party. REQUIRED when kind is "refusal_explanation", 1..2000 characters; REFUSED when kind is "exceptional_proceed".
1 - 2000Mandatory justification for proceeding despite the active restriction. REQUIRED when kind is "exceptional_proceed", 1..2000 characters; REFUSED when kind is "refusal_explanation".
1 - 2000"Holder attested inability to remove the protection; branch manager approved under policy X."
Respuesta
Created
The exceptional circumstance alleged, as filed. Empty on a refusal-explanation record.
The explanation given to the interested party, as filed. Empty on an exceptional-proceed record.
"m2m:core-banking-integration"
The mandatory justification, as filed. Empty on a refusal-explanation record.
Which paragraph of art. 2º-A this record answers: "exceptional_proceed" (§1º) or "refusal_explanation" (§2º). It is the member that says which prose members carry text.
"exceptional_proceed"
Registration instant (RFC3339, UTC). The record is immutable, so this never changes.
Who filed the record (institution-side identity).
"maria.compliance@bank.example"

